- Regulatory Landscape Changes
- Overview of medical devices used in drug clinical trial
- Sponsor responsibilities for medical devices used in the clinical trial according the requirements of MDR/IVDR
- Combined trial and management of the dual submissions
- The Healing Power of Words: Large Language Model’s Potential in Healthcare
- Why Large Language Models Often Fall Short of Medical Device Legislation
- The Keys to Realizing the Potential of Large Language Models in Healthcare
- Unveiling the Impact of the European AI Act's Influence on Large Language Models for Medical Devices
Navigate the challenges surrounding the combined aspects of extractables and leachables, as well as chemical characterizations for combination products.
- A comparison of varying testing conditions used in biological testing for irritation.
- Potential contributing factors to failures in testing outcomes.
- Contextualising unfavourable results in biological testing for clinical relevance.
- Defining Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning – what classifies?
- Overview of legislation relating to AI/ML
- Where does the MDR, IVDR, other regulations, and standards link in?
- Future play – which pieces of legislation are on the horizon?
- Broadening scope
- Analysing the latest SNAIG report including some national regulation
- Recommendations for works of IEC TC 62, JTC1SC42, ISO TC210 and ISO TC 215
- Architecture of new standards in the Area of AI.
- IEC 63450
- Timelines and scope of the IEC 63450 ED1 Testing of Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning-enabled Medical Devices
- Showing the line difference between IEC 63450 and PT 63521 “Machine Learning-enabled Medical Device – Performance Evaluation Process”
- Review of the Standard recommended by SNAIG and their impact on a QMS System for SAMD
- BSI / AAMI 34971:2023, Application of ISO 14971 to machine learning in artificial intelligence
- ISO/IEC TS 4213:2022, Information technology – Artificial intelligence – Assessment of machine learning classification performance
- IEC 60601-4-1 Medical electrical equipment – Part 4-1: Guidance and interpretation – Medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems employing a degree of autonomy (Scope: medical electrical equipment (MEE) and medical electrical systems (MES))
Please contact: Roshni Shah – roshni.shah@informa.com
Or Call +44 (0)7776636553 if you are interested in participating as a speaker, panellist, moderator or hosting a webinar
- State of the art approaches in PMCF
- Current trends in AI to support PMCF activities
- Which AI-Models are compliant?
- Practical Implications, things to remember
- Navigating the interplay
- Where does the MDR and EU AI Act crossover?
- Do expectations for industry align in both regulations?
- How are Notified Bodies and industry navigating the interplay and how are they preparing for compliance?
- Ensuring compliance: how will conformity assessments look with the introduction of the EU AI Act?
- Moving forward
- Best practices for navigating multiple regulations
- Where does usability engineering sit amongst the regulations?
- Interaction with MDR, IVDR and IEC Standards
- Who is responsible?
- Incorporating usability in a multi-disciplinary fashion
- Impact of usability on entire device lifecycle
- Linking to clinical evaluations & investigations and post-market surveillance and vigilance
- Working example: usability in action
- Current regulations under the MDR & IVDR
- Where are they similar and where do they differ?
- Key data points to include in both documents
- Case studies: putting together PMCFs/PMPFs
- Overview of competitive landscape
Overview of regulatory environment
- Regulatory Authorities
- Device Classification
- Product Registration requirement
- Labeling requirement
- GxP requirement
- Post-market requirement
Legal and regulatory consequences of not getting your biocompatibility right under the Medical Devices Regulation
Biocompatibility and product liability (Product Liability Directive and proposed Product Liability Directive Amendment)
National enforcement trends
Biocompatibility and legacy devices
Breathing gas pathway biocompatibility for new manual resuscitator
Planning for biocompatibility in development of breathing device
Testing strategy based on device design and intended use
Learnings from MDR and 510 (k) this far
- Overview of competitive landscape
Overview of regulatory environment
- Regulatory Authorities
- Device Classification
- Product Registration requirement
- Labeling requirement
- GxP requirement
- Post-market requirement
Understanding the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of Nitrosamines
Dissecting the regulatory requirements
Establishing Acceptable Intakes (AIs)
The Less-than-Lifetime concept
- Latest update on the implementation of the AI Act
- How does the AI Act interact with both the MDR and IVDR?
- GDPR
- Difference in obligations based on risk level
- Putting theory into practice
- Application timelines
- Impact on regulators, notified bodies and manufacturers
- Forward thinking
- Can we expect further regulations as AI develops?
- Overview of competitive landscape
Overview of regulatory environment
- Regulatory Authorities
- Device Classification
- Product Registration requirement
- Labeling requirement
- GxP requirement
- Post-market requirement
- According to MDCG 2020-5, what classifies as an equivalent device?
- What are Notified Body expectations when submitting for equivalence?
- Which data is necessary to justify equivalence?
- Is there a point where equivalence = redundancy?
As the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) is expected to enter into force in 2024 and applicable in 2026, planning for its implementation should start now. The horizontal nature of the AIA means that it will interplay with the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR), where tensions and inconsistencies are likely to emerge. In particular, the AIA requires a single conformity assessment procedure for AI-enabled medical devices covered under the MDR. Therefore, for developers of AI-enabled medical devices, the AI Act poses several challenges, including additional obligations related to testing, data governance, post market monitoring and documentation. During this session, we will identify overlaps regarding the combined AI-MD conformity assessment and discuss the significant impact on the medical devices industry as well as ongoing debates. This session aims to enhance participants' comprehension of the conformity assessment procedures pertaining to AI-enabled Medical Devices under the Medical Device Regulation (MDR), while also addressing cybersecurity considerations.
Learning objectives:
Have a better understanding of how the AI Act interlinks with the existing medical device regulation.
Have a better understanding of how the MDR conformity assessment process will be different, due to the application of the AI Act for AI-enabled Medical Devices.
Have a better understanding of what actions to take when Medical Devices is AI enabled and certified prior to the application of the Artificial Intelligence Act.
Consideration of cybersecurity requirements under the MDR, which entails a comprehensive assessment of potential vulnerabilities and safeguards to ensure the integrity and security of AI-enabled Medical Devices throughout their lifecycle
- Identify and discuss appropriate testing methods for substances like creams, gels, fillers, etc.
- Handling chemical analysis for water-absorbent polymers
- Qualification of in vitro testing methods for sensitization and irritation
- Discussing regulatory hurdles
- Uncovering non-animal testing methods***
- When is it necessary to engage in CECPs or PECPs?
- Link to EU MDR 2017/745 and IVDR 2017/746
- Procedure of engaging
- What is expected of manufacturers when executing the procedure?
- What are the common pitfalls?
- Moving forward, how do stakeholders see the procedure evolving?
- What standards are developed at ISO / IEC level regarding AI
- How are ISO / IEC standards transposed into the EU landscape
- What standards developed at CEN / CENELEC level and how do these address AI Act requirements
- What are the implications on the technical documentation and quality management systems of manufacturers
Please contact: Roshni Shah – roshni.shah@informa.com
Or Call +44 (0)7776636553 if you are interested in participating as a speaker, panellist, moderator or hosting a webinar
- Key considerations for QMS development
- Integration of paper modules
- Number of modules
- Periodic reviews
- Elevating quality throughout entire organisation
- Translating importance of QMS regulations for all team members
- Current documentation and regulations for SaMD and AI/ML under the FDA
- Upcoming amendments and publications
- Routes to market
- Utilising local contacts
- Help available
- Future of US SaMD landscape
- Reference to benefit risk analysis in MDR & IVDR
- Importance of benefit risk throughout device and diagnostic lifecycle
- Stages involved in sufficient analysis
- Link to other corresponding documentation and processes
Please contact: Roshni Shah – roshni.shah@informa.com
Or Call +44 (0)7776636553 if you are interested in participating as a speaker, panellist, moderator or hosting a webinar
- Overview of competitive landscape
Overview of regulatory environment
- Regulatory Authorities
- Device Classification
- Product Registration requirement
- Labeling requirement
- GxP requirement
- Post-market requirement
The connections between biocompatibility and cleanliness of devices
Discuss how standardizations differ from organization to organization
Implementing of industry wide standardization practices
Particulate testing within cleanliness validation and verification
Please contact: Roshni Shah – roshni.shah@informa.com
Or Call +44 (0)7776636553 if you are interested in participating as a speaker, panellist, moderator or hosting a webinar
- Current regulations relating to SaMDs and IVDs
- Where is it covered in the MDR & IVDR?
- Link to IEC standards and other legislation
- On-going work
- Which standards are in the pipeline for update or introduction?
- Regulatory Landscape Changes
- Overview of medical devices used in drug clinical trial
- Sponsor responsibilities for medical devices used in the clinical trial according the requirements of MDR/IVDR
- Combined trial and management of the dual submissions
- Reference to benefit risk analysis in MDR & IVDR
- Importance of benefit risk throughout device and diagnostic lifecycle
- Stages involved in sufficient analysis
- Link to other corresponding documentation and processes
- Where does usability engineering sit amongst the regulations?
- Interaction with MDR, IVDR and IEC Standards
- Who is responsible?
- Incorporating usability in a multi-disciplinary fashion
- Impact of usability on entire device lifecycle
- Linking to clinical evaluations & investigations and post-market surveillance and vigilance
- Working example: usability in action
- State of the art approaches in PMCF
- Current trends in AI to support PMCF activities
- Which AI-Models are compliant?
- Practical Implications, things to remember
- When is it necessary to engage in CECPs or PECPs?
- Link to EU MDR 2017/745 and IVDR 2017/746
- Procedure of engaging
- What is expected of manufacturers when executing the procedure?
- What are the common pitfalls?
- Moving forward, how do stakeholders see the procedure evolving?
Please contact: Roshni Shah – roshni.shah@informa.com
Or Call +44 (0)7776636553 if you are interested in participating as a speaker, panellist, moderator or hosting a webinar
- According to MDCG 2020-5, what classifies as an equivalent device?
- What are Notified Body expectations when submitting for equivalence?
- Which data is necessary to justify equivalence?
- Is there a point where equivalence = redundancy?
Please contact: Roshni Shah – roshni.shah@informa.com
Or Call +44 (0)7776636553 if you are interested in participating as a speaker, panellist, moderator or hosting a webinar
- Key considerations for QMS development
- Integration of paper modules
- Number of modules
- Periodic reviews
- Elevating quality throughout entire organisation
- Translating importance of QMS regulations for all team members
- Current regulations under the MDR & IVDR
- Where are they similar and where do they differ?
- Key data points to include in both documents
- Case studies: putting together PMCFs/PMPFs
- Identify and discuss appropriate testing methods for substances like creams, gels, fillers, etc.
- Handling chemical analysis for water-absorbent polymers
The connections between biocompatibility and cleanliness of devices
Discuss how standardizations differ from organization to organization
Implementing of industry wide standardization practices
Particulate testing within cleanliness validation and verification
- Qualification of in vitro testing methods for sensitization and irritation
- Discussing regulatory hurdles
- Uncovering non-animal testing methods***
- A comparison of varying testing conditions used in biological testing for irritation.
- Potential contributing factors to failures in testing outcomes.
- Contextualising unfavourable results in biological testing for clinical relevance.
Breathing gas pathway biocompatibility for new manual resuscitator
Planning for biocompatibility in development of breathing device
Testing strategy based on device design and intended use
Learnings from MDR and 510 (k) this far
Navigate the challenges surrounding the combined aspects of extractables and leachables, as well as chemical characterizations for combination products.
Ensuring Biological safety over the device life cycle for manufacturers
Effectively conducting biosafety evaluations and reporting
Understanding the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of Nitrosamines
Dissecting the regulatory requirements
Establishing Acceptable Intakes (AIs)
The Less-than-Lifetime concept
Legal and regulatory consequences of not getting your biocompatibility right under the Medical Devices Regulation
Biocompatibility and product liability (Product Liability Directive and proposed Product Liability Directive Amendment)
National enforcement trends
Biocompatibility and legacy devices
- Current regulations relating to SaMDs and IVDs
- Where is it covered in the MDR & IVDR?
- Link to IEC standards and other legislation
- On-going work
- Which standards are in the pipeline for update or introduction?
- Defining Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning – what classifies?
- Overview of legislation relating to AI/ML
- Where does the MDR, IVDR, other regulations, and standards link in?
- Future play – which pieces of legislation are on the horizon?
As the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) is expected to enter into force in 2024 and applicable in 2026, planning for its implementation should start now. The horizontal nature of the AIA means that it will interplay with the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR), where tensions and inconsistencies are likely to emerge. In particular, the AIA requires a single conformity assessment procedure for AI-enabled medical devices covered under the MDR. Therefore, for developers of AI-enabled medical devices, the AI Act poses several challenges, including additional obligations related to testing, data governance, post market monitoring and documentation. During this session, we will identify overlaps regarding the combined AI-MD conformity assessment and discuss the significant impact on the medical devices industry as well as ongoing debates. This session aims to enhance participants' comprehension of the conformity assessment procedures pertaining to AI-enabled Medical Devices under the Medical Device Regulation (MDR), while also addressing cybersecurity considerations.
Learning objectives:
Have a better understanding of how the AI Act interlinks with the existing medical device regulation.
Have a better understanding of how the MDR conformity assessment process will be different, due to the application of the AI Act for AI-enabled Medical Devices.
Have a better understanding of what actions to take when Medical Devices is AI enabled and certified prior to the application of the Artificial Intelligence Act.
Consideration of cybersecurity requirements under the MDR, which entails a comprehensive assessment of potential vulnerabilities and safeguards to ensure the integrity and security of AI-enabled Medical Devices throughout their lifecycle
- What standards are developed at ISO / IEC level regarding AI
- How are ISO / IEC standards transposed into the EU landscape
- What standards developed at CEN / CENELEC level and how do these address AI Act requirements
- What are the implications on the technical documentation and quality management systems of manufacturers
- Broadening scope
- Analysing the latest SNAIG report including some national regulation
- Recommendations for works of IEC TC 62, JTC1SC42, ISO TC210 and ISO TC 215
- Architecture of new standards in the Area of AI.
- IEC 63450
- Timelines and scope of the IEC 63450 ED1 Testing of Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning-enabled Medical Devices
- Showing the line difference between IEC 63450 and PT 63521 “Machine Learning-enabled Medical Device – Performance Evaluation Process”
- Review of the Standard recommended by SNAIG and their impact on a QMS System for SAMD
- BSI / AAMI 34971:2023, Application of ISO 14971 to machine learning in artificial intelligence
- ISO/IEC TS 4213:2022, Information technology – Artificial intelligence – Assessment of machine learning classification performance
- IEC 60601-4-1 Medical electrical equipment – Part 4-1: Guidance and interpretation – Medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems employing a degree of autonomy (Scope: medical electrical equipment (MEE) and medical electrical systems (MES))
- Current documentation and regulations for SaMD and AI/ML under the FDA
- Upcoming amendments and publications
- Routes to market
- Utilising local contacts
- Help available
- Future of US SaMD landscape
Please contact: Roshni Shah – roshni.shah@informa.com
Or Call +44 (0)7776636553 if you are interested in participating as a speaker, panellist, moderator or hosting a webinar
- Latest update on the implementation of the AI Act
- How does the AI Act interact with both the MDR and IVDR?
- GDPR
- Difference in obligations based on risk level
- Putting theory into practice
- Application timelines
- Impact on regulators, notified bodies and manufacturers
- Forward thinking
- Can we expect further regulations as AI develops?
Please contact: Roshni Shah – roshni.shah@informa.com
Or Call +44 (0)7776636553 if you are interested in participating as a speaker, panellist, moderator or hosting a webinar
- The Healing Power of Words: Large Language Model’s Potential in Healthcare
- Why Large Language Models Often Fall Short of Medical Device Legislation
- The Keys to Realizing the Potential of Large Language Models in Healthcare
- Unveiling the Impact of the European AI Act's Influence on Large Language Models for Medical Devices
- Navigating the interplay
- Where does the MDR and EU AI Act crossover?
- Do expectations for industry align in both regulations?
- How are Notified Bodies and industry navigating the interplay and how are they preparing for compliance?
- Ensuring compliance: how will conformity assessments look with the introduction of the EU AI Act?
- Moving forward
- Best practices for navigating multiple regulations
- Overview of competitive landscape
Overview of regulatory environment
- Regulatory Authorities
- Device Classification
- Product Registration requirement
- Labeling requirement
- GxP requirement
- Post-market requirement
- Overview of competitive landscape
Overview of regulatory environment
- Regulatory Authorities
- Device Classification
- Product Registration requirement
- Labeling requirement
- GxP requirement
- Post-market requirement
- Overview of competitive landscape
Overview of regulatory environment
- Regulatory Authorities
- Device Classification
- Product Registration requirement
- Labeling requirement
- GxP requirement
- Post-market requirement
- Overview of competitive landscape
Overview of regulatory environment
- Regulatory Authorities
- Device Classification
- Product Registration requirement
- Labeling requirement
- GxP requirement
- Post-market requirement