Day Three – 18 June 2025 - CEST Time Zone
- Beau Rollins - Head of Biocompatibility, ConvaTec
- What does the latest revision to ISO 10993-1 really mean for you?
- What are the biggest changes between versions?
- What do manufacturers and testing facilities need to do differently?
- Examples of various product cases on how changes can affect the biological evaluation of already marketed devices and devices under development.
- Jeannette van Loon, PhD - CEO at Medical Device Project B.V, Member, ISO TC 194 WG1
One of the key revisions for –1 centres around genotoxicity, but what does this mean?
Which groups is this endpoint applicable to now?
Why has this change materialised?
What does this increased evaluation mean for wider public health?
- Best practices for applying genotoxicity to those who have not previously
- Crystal D’Silva - Associate Director, Material Characterization and Assessment, Baxter
- Michael Thaller - Product Developer & Biocompatibility & Product Safety Specialist, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
With –17 having been in place for 1 year, what are industry’s first experiences of adhering to the standard?
Are there differences in EU and FDA acceptance?
Can we expect further alignment?
Which parts are causing the most confusion?
Possible solutions to ease working under -17
- Michelle Kelly - Toxicologist, NAMSA
- Jianwei Li - Chemical Characterization Consultant and Technical Writer, Chemical Characterization Solutions, LLC
- Beau Rollins - Head of Biocompatibility, ConvaTec
What is chemical characterization?
Semi quantitative vs quantitative analysis
Substance Identification Challenges
Findings
- Daniel Andreas Klauser - Medical Device Safety Specialist MDR, Zimmer Biomet
- Boopathy Dhanapal - Convener of ISO/TC 194 WG 18, Independent Consultant
What are these updates?
Are there any impacts for manufacturers?
Do biological evaluations and modalities need to be revised?
Which alternatives are available, and should we consider using them?
- Beau Rollins - Head of Biocompatibility, ConvaTec
- As the debate rumbles on, where are we with global acceptance of in vitro vs in vivo testing?
- Has the US moved more towards acceptance?
- Industry implications
- Can industry streamline testing methods to be applicable for both regions?
- Which areas commonly cause issues with submissions?
- Practices to overcome
- Emma Pedersen - Senior Scientist Biocompatibility, Mölnlycke Health Care
- Vera Dowling - Senior Principal Biocompatibility Manager, Cardinal Health
- Matthew Jorgensen - Toxicologist, Global Biocompatibility, Teleflex