What is the most common misconception around private placements? Pedro Madeira, Head of Corporate Finance at Impala Terminals, shares his experience navigating this market, investor relationships, and capital strategy.
Key takeaways for issuers:
- Private placements are more accessible than many assume, even for mid-sized corporates that might have only relied on bank lending.
- Repeat borrowing matters. Investors prefer repeat borrowers because the due diligence and relationship-building investment pays off over time, leading to better terms, trust, and broader market access.
- Private placements complement public markets by offering flexibility in size, tenor, and currency mix, with less volatility.
Understanding the accessibility of private placements
One significant misunderstanding is the perceived inaccessibility of the market, especially among first-time issuers or those accustomed to bank lending. While preparation is essential, the private market is in fact quite open, even to medium-sized corporations. Many companies find themselves overly reliant on bank lending, apprehensive about transitioning to private placements. Yet, Madeira emphasises that the private market can be an excellent complement, even for larger issuers who are active in public markets.
The value of building investor relationships
A key differentiator between long-term and one-time borrowers is the emphasis on relationship building with investors. Investors often favour repeat borrowers. This mutual relationship benefits both parties; investors invest considerable time in due diligence and prefer borrowers with whom they can establish a long-term connection. The initial skepticism investors might have (wondering if a borrower will return) can be mitigated by demonstrating a commitment to future engagements. Such relationships foster trust and improve terms over time, broadening market access and ensuring a stable and consistent investor base.
Integrating private placements into broader capital strategies
When evaluating the role of private placements within a broader financing strategy, their flexibility and stability stand out. Despite the historically higher premiums associated with privates, the pricing gap has narrowed, making them a more cost-effective option. Additionally, the flexibility in terms, sizes, tenors, and even currency mixes offers substantial advantages. In volatile times, the more relationship-driven private market proves less susceptible to the fluctuations seen in public markets.
From the issuer's perspective, particularly for smaller debt book issuers, private placements offer strategic benefits. They provide the ability to maintain a smooth maturity profile and diversify away from complete reliance on bank lending. This diversification allows issuers to create a more stable long-term capital structure by cultivating a broad base of investors, different from the often narrower scope within public markets.
Private placements serve as a pivotal component of a well-rounded capital strategy. Their role is particularly salient in fostering stable, long-term relationships and providing adaptable financing solutions that are less vulnerable to market volatility.
For issuers, embracing the opportunities presented by private placements could mean reshaping how they engage with capital markets, thereby enhancing their strategic financial planning.

